Comments on: Sarah Palin Rubber Dodo Award

By: rox

rox — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:43:36 +0000

There are literally hundreds, if not thousands, of scientists who remain skeptical of human-caused global warming and that list is growing by the day. That’s a fact.

I suggest people look into how Mann’s data were derived.

By: NOYFB

NOYFB — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:22:45 +0000

I’m a bit tired right now, so i’m too lazy to look up links but a google search should net enough. Many meteorologists (people who study weather patterns as far back as recorded history goes)have stated that Global Warming is bullocks, we haven’t deviated from normal weather patterns. Carl Bohnak (spelling on last name may or may not be wrong) wrote an excellent article in Northern Michigan Universities Alumni publication sometime this past summer on the subject, where he quotes and sites other meteorologist on the matter. That should be enough to get you jackasses started.

By: jason

jason — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:00:52 +0000

Dr. Claude

Don’t you know that sarcasm is lost in text?

By: Dr. Claude Miller

Dr. Claude Miller — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:50:51 +0000

Lighten up on Sarah; she still has many thousands of times the integrity and intelligence of Obama.

In fact, together, Obama and Biden are intellectually subordinate to Sarah Palin.

BTW, I’m not a Republican; just an independent… you know, the one’s that WILL decide this election.

By: Evan

Evan — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:26:06 +0000

Though the whole global cooling thing by today’s perspective seems absurd, people thought it was going on in the ’70s. Below are a couple of sources.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
http://www.denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

Before anyone goes on a tangent about the environment one way or another, we should see what is economically feasible in order to save energy. I drive an ‘01 Nissan Altima, I bought it used, and gets fairly good mileage, I try to keep my tires pumped, and oil changed. I replaced all the light bulbs in my home with florescent bulbs, which can allow me to state that I typically only have a 50 dollar electric bill, with 2 computers on all the time (for remote access purposes). My comments on the issue one way or another, is just pick the low hanging fruit first.

By: Burber

Burber — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:25:42 +0000

Rastlin’s off his meds again…

By: Bill

Bill — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:54:08 +0000

Global warming was some bull catch phrase, Global Warming MEANS Climate Change, jesus christ people…

By: Scott

Scott — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:09:06 +0000

Sorry, forgot the link:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sun

By: Scott

Scott — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:08:28 +0000

Global warming is not so black and white as you both suggest. I would respectfully suggest you watch this video documentary by PBS’s Nova Science program. This is a double edged sword. If we continue, there is no scientific doubt we will see global temperatures increase, but if we eliminate carbon output too fast we will also increase global temperatures. This doc. suggest it is the pollution itself that is dimming the sunlight reaching the earth and countering the Green House gases.

By: Se7in

Se7in — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:07:13 +0000

Thank you LoudPatriot, but he is blind. Blind to reason for sure, and I’m beginning to think they all are. Voting along party lines and believing whatever these neo-con pieces want them to believe… “oh tax beaks for the rich will help my poor ass? cool!”.
And Rastlin… religious scientists and scholars don’t count when it comes to a debate about the earth’s climate change. Read outside the christian conservative blogs about how all of us “college edumacated” types are ruining america with our humanistic morals and our testable science. Damn us.